Upping the tempo.

Tips and techniques of the trade

Moderators: Mr Awesomer, JesseMiner, CafeSavoy

Message
Author
julius
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 11:30 am
Location: los angeles

#61 Post by julius » Thu Oct 07, 2004 12:08 pm

I think an important ingredient in faster music is having a clearly defined rhythm so that people don't get lost. Classic swing music has an awesome four on the floor pulse that is irresistable. A lot of postwar arrangements feature more fragmented rhythms (e.g. ride cymbal work, dropping bombs on the bass drum) that makes it much, much harder to dance fast. In my opinion.

Nothing is more frustrating than finally being able to swing out at 225 bpm when suddenly the recording goes into a frenzied chaos of arrhythmic soloing and nasty clangorous drum fills. Suddenly the dancer who was barely clinging on for dear life is thrown overboard and drowns.

I also agree that you have to accustom dancers' ears to faster music first, then their feet, then their bodies, and finally their dancing. Hence the progression of "clearing the floor" ->"balboa" ->"bad fast dancing" ->"overwhelming joy at doing the impossible".

Last night Wendy Rea's band played at TJ's in Orange County (a place not known for quality fast dancing) but the floor was constantly full at all tempos, 80 to 280. Good music will compel people to dance.

julius
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 11:30 am
Location: los angeles

#62 Post by julius » Thu Oct 07, 2004 12:11 pm

...provided the dancers don't have a preconceived mindset.

Toon Town Dave
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 2:52 pm
Location: Saskatoon, Canada

#63 Post by Toon Town Dave » Thu Oct 07, 2004 3:35 pm

I was DJing the U of S practice/dance last week and I wanted to set up for an Albert Ammons boogie. I played Gene Krupa's Sweet Georgia Brown figuring I'd clear the floor with something fast-ish then the Ammons stuff would not feel so fast. Most of the newbies fresh out of the triple-step, triple-step, rock step lesson danced to the Krupa track and had no problem keeping up.

I'm happy to see the newbies trying to dance a variety of tempos and doing a good job of it :)

User avatar
sonofvu
Posts: 246
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 10:15 am
Location: Austin, TX

#64 Post by sonofvu » Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:14 pm

Toon Town Dave wrote:
Most of the newbies fresh out of the triple-step, triple-step, rock step lesson danced to the Krupa track and had no problem keeping up.

I'm happy to see the newbies trying to dance a variety of tempos and doing a good job of it :)
It's incredible to me how when you are a newbie you can dance to something say at 180 BPM but as you get better you resist the notion of going over 150.
Yard work sucks. I would much rather dj.

mousethief
Posts: 984
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: dfw - a wretched hive of scum & villainy

#65 Post by mousethief » Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:21 pm

Maybe it's Dizzy Gillespie speaking beyond the grave. You know, the "slow it down so you can have a sandwich in between notes" concept.

Kalman
"The cause of reform is hurt, not helped, when an activist makes an idiotic suggestion."

User avatar
Lawrence
Posts: 1213
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 2:08 pm
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

#66 Post by Lawrence » Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:30 pm

sonofvu wrote:It's incredible to me how when you are a newbie you can dance to something say at 180 BPM but as you get better you resist the notion of going over 150.
The more experienced you get, George, the more you realize that speed kills. :wink:
Lawrence Page
Austin Lindy Hop
http://www.AustinLindy.com

User avatar
Mr Awesomer
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 10:21 pm
Location: Altadena, CA
Contact:

#67 Post by Mr Awesomer » Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:45 pm

...off the weak leaving only the strong to survive.
Reuben Brown
Southern California

julius
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 11:30 am
Location: los angeles

#68 Post by julius » Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm

Lately I really enjoy dancing at the extremes, either fast or slow, but the medium zone, well, been there a lot. I still enjoy it, but as far as pushing myself, it's not in the medium zone.

mousethief
Posts: 984
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: dfw - a wretched hive of scum & villainy

#69 Post by mousethief » Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:46 am

I have a problem when dancers use tempo as a crutch. If you only want to dance at Oscar Peterson and Ernestine Anderson between 130 and 160 BPM, fine. If you can only dance to pieces above 200 BPM, fine. Just remember that you're investing time and money to stay in a small box.

Kalman
"The cause of reform is hurt, not helped, when an activist makes an idiotic suggestion."

User avatar
funkyfreak
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2002 10:53 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

#70 Post by funkyfreak » Wed Oct 20, 2004 11:46 am

sonofvu wrote:It's incredible to me how when you are a newbie you can dance to something say at 180 BPM but as you get better you resist the notion of going over 150.
Bingo. I've wondered how the music that is selected to be intentionally slow so you can practice to it became a standard dancing speed that some people don't want to leave...

But anyway, when it comes to getting your scene's dancers in general to dance faster, like everyone said -- nobody feels comfortable dancing to a tempo they haven't danced at before. So play (good) faster tunes. I don't think the answer is any more complicated than that. DJ faster songs, DJ them well.

-FF

Locked