Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2004 12:55 pm
Ah... missed that thread. Thanks.
Ah... missed that thread. Thanks.
That sounds like a great way to run the contest. Was the audience into being so much a part of the process? I kinda get the feeling that people around here would complain that it took away from precious moments of dancing...?SirScratchAlot wrote:basically it was tournament Ladder, draw your opponent, flip a coin to go first or last, and then you play 3 songs. thats it, crowd decides, split decisions are decided by dancers stepping to either side of the floor, to have their vote counted.
the last two DJs go to the final which is only playin 2 songs.
Yea, acually it was a great way to do it, much easier the a time slot of lets say 20 minutes of going back and forth. (as long as somewhat standard length songs are used).Greg Avakian wrote:Congradulations Peter!
That sounds like a great way to run the contest. Was the audience into being so much a part of the process? I kinda get the feeling that people around here would complain that it took away from precious moments of dancing...?SirScratchAlot wrote:basically it was tournament Ladder, draw your opponent, flip a coin to go first or last, and then you play 3 songs. thats it, crowd decides, split decisions are decided by dancers stepping to either side of the floor, to have their vote counted.
the last two DJs go to the final which is only playin 2 songs.