Does it swing???

Everything about the swinging music we love to DJ

Moderators: Mr Awesomer, JesseMiner, CafeSavoy

Message
Author
User avatar
Greg Avakian
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 10:27 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Does it swing???

#1 Post by Greg Avakian » Fri Feb 14, 2003 10:45 am

Thaere is a discussion on Yehoodi about what defines swing music and some thought being given to swung eighths and driving rhythm. i thought it might be fun to discuss some of this stuff here since we probably all know or have a bunch of versions of the same songs.
I know this could turn into a big arguement, but hopefully we can all learn something by listening to others' perspective on what they hear in a piece of music. Here's an idea of what I'm talking about:


Benny Goodman's Exactly like you: pretty straight eighths, swings

Bill Coleman's Exactly like you: slightly swung eighths, swings

Django Rhinehart's Exactly like you: more swung eighths, doesn't really swing

Carmen McCrae's Exactly like you: swung eighths, kicks swing butt


Comments?

User avatar
Mr Awesomer
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 10:21 pm
Location: Altadena, CA
Contact:

#2 Post by Mr Awesomer » Fri Feb 14, 2003 11:00 am

Lot's of shit swings.

And you can read the above many different ways.

:D
Reuben Brown
Southern California

User avatar
Kyle
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 3:01 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

#3 Post by Kyle » Fri Feb 14, 2003 2:54 pm

"Rhythmic Displacement"

that is how i have heard it defined, and i think those two words are all that you need. it leaves out everything else. it leaves out genre, style, technique, taste, etc.....

User avatar
Ron
Posts: 313
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 4:29 pm
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

#4 Post by Ron » Fri Feb 14, 2003 7:15 pm

Not this again.

The only way "swings" has any real meaning is if it describes a song with swinging eights. A song either has them or it doesn't and its not opinion.

Unfortunately, plenty of people, including musicians, use it to mean "I like it!", "makes me want to move!" or "its great!" Yeah, go ahead and use it that way if you want, but it doesn't mean anything other than an opinion.

I like to use it as follows: "Brian Setzer's music swings, but it sucks."

User avatar
Kyle
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 3:01 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

#5 Post by Kyle » Fri Feb 14, 2003 7:45 pm

Ron wrote: The only way "swings" has any real meaning is if it describes a song with swinging eights....

I like to use it as follows: "Brian Setzer's music swings, but it sucks."
yeah, but Brian Setzer plays mostly 12 bar blues, so how does that work out?

User avatar
Greg Avakian
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 10:27 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

#6 Post by Greg Avakian » Fri Feb 14, 2003 9:32 pm

Because -please learn this- Blues: Swings!. Swing has nothing to do with whether there are 32 or 48 beats in a phrase. Nothing. Jeez, start counting beats in Basie's phrases...

User avatar
CafeSavoy
Posts: 1138
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 6:25 pm
Location: Mobtown
Contact:

#7 Post by CafeSavoy » Sun Feb 16, 2003 3:36 pm

Greg Avakian wrote:Because -please learn this- Blues: Swings!. Swing has nothing to do with whether there are 32 or 48 beats in a phrase. Nothing. Jeez, start counting beats in Basie's phrases...
blues can't swing, look at basie.
can we have some swing music please.

User avatar
Greg Avakian
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 10:27 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

#8 Post by Greg Avakian » Sun Feb 16, 2003 5:34 pm

CafeSavoy wrote: blues can't swing, look at basie.
can we have some swing music please.
Oh.
well, you know, I'm really sorry. Please spank me now sir.

User avatar
CafeSavoy
Posts: 1138
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 6:25 pm
Location: Mobtown
Contact:

#9 Post by CafeSavoy » Sun Feb 16, 2003 7:45 pm

Greg Avakian wrote:
CafeSavoy wrote: blues can't swing, look at basie.
can we have some swing music please.
Oh.
well, you know, I'm really sorry. Please spank me now sir.
i'll leave that to big daddy pigmeat.

User avatar
Greg Avakian
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 10:27 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

#10 Post by Greg Avakian » Mon Feb 17, 2003 12:28 am

Hmmm ...that's not what he's going yo spank me with is it? I'm a vegetarian you know...

User avatar
Kyle
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 3:01 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

#11 Post by Kyle » Mon Feb 17, 2003 3:07 am

ummm,

it's Sweet Papa Pigmeat, and that's ME! :shock:

User avatar
main_stem
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:01 am
Location: Seattle, WA

#12 Post by main_stem » Mon Feb 17, 2003 9:12 am

Kyle wrote:
yeah, but Brian Setzer plays mostly 12 bar blues, so how does that work out?
Read Albert Murry's Stomping the Blues. He does a far better job explaining it than I can.
"We called it music."
— Eddie Condon

User avatar
Greg Avakian
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 10:27 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

#13 Post by Greg Avakian » Mon Feb 17, 2003 9:15 am

Uh oh...

User avatar
main_stem
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:01 am
Location: Seattle, WA

#14 Post by main_stem » Mon Feb 17, 2003 9:33 am

There must be something in the air I was re-reading part of Jazz Dance that talked about this.

Swing is something that is felt and pervasive in many forms of jazz, yet there is no simple way to describe it in analytical terms. Every atempt falls short of the goal.

It's a matter of interpritation. For some it's anything with with a steady 4/4 time (I like to term this music with swing feel, but not really swing music. That's just my opinion though.). For others it's got to be jazz with it's tension and realease, propulsive rhythms and syncapations. (To me this is swing.) Then there are all the other stops inbetween.

Where ever your definition ends up it's always good to reevaluate and look and different definitions and learn more about the music.

-Kevin
Seattle
"We called it music."
— Eddie Condon

Nate Dogg
Posts: 886
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 3:29 pm
Location: Austin, TX

#15 Post by Nate Dogg » Mon Feb 17, 2003 3:10 pm

I guess since this thread was inspired by Yehoodi, it can behave like other threads of its ilk.

Group A - States the strict definition. Of course, they are correct.

Group B - Those who are willing to accept that a term may have evolved to have multiple meanings and are generally less dogmatic in their views.

The two sides bicker.

This basic dynamic is repeated over and over again, on all sorts of topics (see that Lindy Exchange Gripe thread on Yehoodi for a good example).

Personally, I fall into Group B. Yes, a lot of so-called swing music is not technically swing music. On the other hand, a lot of dancers don't know or don't care. They care about whether it sucks or not, whether it fits in, etc ...

Locked