Perhaps that's just my overgeneralization of it?Lawrence wrote:Baiting???

-FF
Moderators: Mr Awesomer, JesseMiner, CafeSavoy
Oh Jesus. Good call, FF.funkyfreak wrote:Italics mine. Baiting yours.Lawrence wrote:yours would like high-energy fast music, whereas mine would like music you could sink you teeth into and doesn't fly by too fast to enjoy.
There is a significant crowd that wants exactly the opposite, and really enjoys hearing accessible swing music...
-FF
I don't see why a fad from six years ago would rope in everybody who wanted to dance to high energy music. As fads go, it wasn't exactly culturally all-pervasive. Plus six years ago some of LA's newbies were, uh, 12?Lawrence wrote: I understand your point about high-energy music attracting people, but most of those people would have been roped in through the Neo Swing craze six years ago if high-energy music was what they wanted.
It depends on what kind of newbie you are dealing with.mousethief wrote:Even better, those same beginners still come to me with requests from 5+ years ago.
Can I hear Zoot Suit Riot? No? Then Jump, Jive & Wail? No?? Then something by Brian Setzer? Aw jeez, nothing?
Kalman
If we all merely thought back to the way we interpreted swing when we were beginners, then the scene won't evolve, learning curves won't diminish over time, and we'll be stuck trying to recruit people ten years from now with music that recruited us ten years ago. Or we would all end up dancing like Nathan when he was a beginner.Nate Dogg wrote:As a rule of thumb, I think back to how I would have danced to a track back when I was a beginner, as well as what the song does for me as an experienced dancer.
Often times, when I am in a room filled with people who only know six count and they just learned it that night, I will go back to what I danced to when I was in their shoes, than means neo-swing, old rock n' roll, jump blues, faster swing that you can six count to, etc...
It was pervasive enough when it was a part of the halftime show at the Superbowl, but, yes, I do keep forgetting how young some people are....julius wrote:I don't see why a fad from six years ago would rope in everybody who wanted to dance to high energy music. As fads go, it wasn't exactly culturally all-pervasive. Plus six years ago some of LA's newbies were, uh, 12?Lawrence wrote: I understand your point about high-energy music attracting people, but most of those people would have been roped in through the Neo Swing craze six years ago if high-energy music was what they wanted.
HAHA. That's exactly what I was going to point out.falty411 wrote:In my 5 years of Djing I have never heard a newbie request Harris' version of "Don't Get Around Much Anymore", Rod Stewart's "Having a Party" off his Unplugged disc, or any other "with a rich, deep, hard-grooving swing".
What I have heard requests for from newbies:
Sing Sing Sing
Jump Jive and Wail
Jumpin at the Woodside
Shout and Feel It
Zoot Suit Riot
Go Daddy-O
"That song" off of the Swing Kids Soundtrack
etc....
Who said I was trying to recruit with it?Lawrence wrote:Nate Dogg wrote:If we all merely thought back to the way we interpreted swing when we were beginners, then the scene won't evolve, learning curves won't diminish over time, and we'll be stuck trying to recruit people ten years from now with music that recruited us ten years ago. Or we would all end up dancing like Nathan when he was a beginner.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I agree with using that experience as a factor, but not as a guiding beacon that solely controls what you play. Perhaps there are faster or better routes up the same mountain than the one you took.
i agree with though that there's alot of fluff in the basie recordings. i ripped about 1500 songs and less than 600 will make my book. Actually i'm hoping to get it down to less than 400.mousethief wrote:Basie is my number one pick for any dance, Old or New or Atomic. I find that I enjoy older over newer but that might not always manifest itself in my sets.
Kalman
Cool. Just curious since it seems some of this discussion is just folks projecting their tastes on newbies. I tend to agree that music with energy and clear rhythms seem to work better; also interesting lyrics. Which is probably why Buddy Johnson was probably the most popular band of his day. It is interesting that many jazz fans tend to look down on jump and rock'n'roll but they probably will draw more people than some of the more esoteric genres both old and new.yedancer wrote: I think that faster, high-energy music is more attractive to newbies. This is based on personal observation over the past year or so.