No wonder you're behind the beat.Surreal wrote: I prefer black bottom myself.
can't believe I just said that

Moderators: Mr Awesomer, JesseMiner, CafeSavoy
Sniff sniff...moose-eating surrender monkey?Surreal wrote:Heh, pretty much, but whatever works. I'd much rather get them on the floor first and just have them goof around instead of standing around on the sidelines.
Because it makes them happy.Eyeball wrote:Why are some DJs so willing to simply offer whatever people want?
I guess this is our significant point of disagreement. Why is swing dancing what it is? Why is Waltz or Tango or Rhumba or Polka or Funk what it is? Because of the music. The music is the main inspiration, dancing with the music is what makes dance engaging. It's part of why we dig that hot girl shaking her booty to the music at the night club.Surreal wrote:I for one do not believe that the dance must be married to the music.
All this is 'off-topic' because it's about social dancing, not teaching for beginners. But there's a good argument for playing anything that will get people up dancing - as opposed to sitting watching.Toon Town Dave wrote:Finally, Surreal, based on how you described the situation (people weren't dancing to your other music), I can't fault you for the choice since it is indeed the job of the DJ to keep the crowd happy since that is why you are hired. If the event is billed as a swing dance, then I think the organizers have a problem. If people go to a swing dance and don't want to dance to swing music, there is a problem somewhere.
I think he explained things right in his post.Surreal wrote:I was just thinking today that any of the typical music that we play during our Manitoba socials will probably get people dancing.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.Mr Awesomer wrote:I think he explained things right in his post.Surreal wrote:I was just thinking today that any of the typical music that we play during our Manitoba socials will probably get people dancing.
He's running Socials... not Swing dances.