Recording technique recommended for a new big band album
Moderators: Mr Awesomer, JesseMiner, CafeSavoy
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:36 am
- Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Recording technique recommended for a new big band album
I am part of a group of people that is trying to shape a CD of a big band that plays Bennie Goodman material and new material in Bennie Goodman style. One of the questions that came up was which recording technique should be used. I know there was already a thread on recording techniques called "New Big Bands Recordings vs. Original Recordings", but this thread does not answer what we as dancers and DJs like best. Personally I do not really care, but maybe there are people out there who do have a strong preference. Should we use one microphone and record the whole band in one go, or should we record all sections separate. Should we use old microphones,... Any ideas are welcome. The main criteria is that the CD should appeal to dancers. What do swing DJs recommend?
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:36 am
- Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Trevor and Alex, thanks for the suggestions. However I am more interested in your opinions as DJ's than in the opinion of the band leaders you refer to (although I would not mind them chiming in). The people that I work with know a lot about recording technique, but they do not know what appeals most to us DJ's and dancers. Like I said, I personally do not care as much as long as the song swings and this band swings hard, so I can not advice them which way to go. Maybe you can. Do you like the vintage sound or do you like the crisp studio recordings of modern bands? I really value any input from you DJs. If you put on a record of a contemporary band, do you ever think, well this is nice but it would have been much better if they used vintage microphones or had done a live recording or .....
- Mr Awesomer
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 10:21 pm
- Location: Altadena, CA
- Contact:
While I appreciate the desire to "keep things real" by using the old recording techniques, quite frankly I would much rather have a band record using modern methods. That said though, it really doesn't matter much when it comes time to DJ... since no one records a band in such a way so as to ensure it sounds best played over the crappy PA system at your local dance studio (nor should they.)
Reuben Brown
Southern California
Southern California
In that case, I think I'm with you on this one, Robert: I don't personally care that much. (Or perhaps it's more accurate to say I don't know enough about it to care, which is another way of saying it doesn't make enough of a difference to me for me to have noticed and invested time in learning more about it...in short: whatev.)
Just keep the songs short and the rhythm section strong and I'll be happy.
Just keep the songs short and the rhythm section strong and I'll be happy.
Agreed! As a DJ this is by far more important than the recording technique. I would focus on which environment is likely to produce the best playing. Often studio recordings, with everyone recording their parts separately sound more stilted than a "live" recording where everyone is more relaxed.lipi wrote: Just keep the songs short and the rhythm section strong and I'll be happy.
Amen to that.trev wrote:I would focus on which environment is likely to produce the best playing. Often studio recordings, with everyone recording their parts separately sound more stilted than a "live" recording where everyone is more relaxed.
But really, are any jazz musicians recording their parts separately these days? It might have happened in the 1980s, when focus sometimes tended to be on technical perfection rather than an organic ensemble feel, but surely those ideals are long gone? One can hope.
-
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 2:52 pm
- Location: Saskatoon, Canada
Re: Recording technique recommended for a new big band album
Robert - which Benny Goodman songs you are planning to record?Robert Cullen wrote:I am part of a group of people that is trying to shape a CD of a big band that plays Bennie Goodman material
Fully agree.trev wrote: Agreed! As a DJ this is by far more important than the recording technique. I would focus on which environment is likely to produce the best playing. Often studio recordings, with everyone recording their parts separately sound more stilted than a "live" recording where everyone is more relaxed.
Is this going to be a similar line-up to the one that played at ALX last year? Exciting news, if so. Can't wait to hear what you come up with!
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:36 am
- Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Hi Andy, yes the recording will be done by the band that played at the most recent Amsterdam Lindy Exchange (and yes, in a similar line up). The good news is that they will also play at the coming Amsterdam Lindy Exchange (first weekend of July). Unfortunately you will not be able to pick up the album there since the planning is to record it in the studion that same weekend. Having both activities -- playing live at ALX and recording in the studio -- in the same weekend should without a doubt lead to a great performance. As you can imagine I am really looking forward to this weekend. Hope to see you there.
Re: Recording technique recommended for a new big band album
It would be useful to have one or two examples of the Benny Goodman tracks you are going to record. In my opinion, the majority of modern big band swing CDs come nowhere near matching the feel or sound of the orginal bands of the 1930s and 1940s like Benny Goodman and Glenn Miller. However this means if you can produce something good, it will really stand outRobert Cullen wrote:I am part of a group of people that is trying to shape a CD of a big band that plays Bennie Goodman material and new material in Bennie Goodman style. One of the questions that came up was which recording technique should be used ... Any ideas are welcome. The main criteria is that the CD should appeal to dancers. What do swing DJs recommend?

As far as recording techniques go (which was actually your question), I think records from the swing era have a warmth that suits the music. Perhaps being mono helps. This is only a hunch, but 've got an idea that if you use too many microphones to capture the sound of the individual instruments, you will gain detail but lose rhythmic swing feel. I think if you are recording swing music, then that rhythmic feel is everything. In other words, it's more important to feel the excitement of the rhythm than to hear the individual instruments.
If you have access to a regular swing club, you could actually try recording a particular track with different recording techniques, and then play different versions at the club and see how they come over, and ask the opinion of some friendly dancers or DJs there.
It would be great to know when you have recorded the CD, and I'm sure quite a few people here would be interested in buying a copy

-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:36 am
- Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Hi Haydn, thanks for your elaborate answer. We are still working on the list of songs to be recorded, but the bulk will be for certain songs from the second half of the thirties. It is very likely that songs like Swingtime in the Rockies, Downsouth Camp Meeting and Roll'em will make it to the CD. Also lower tempo songs like He ain't got rhythm and Blue skies are good candidates for the CD.
Re: Recording technique recommended for a new big band album
Have you seen these guys? If not, get yourself to ALX this year (alas - I don't think we can make it this time around)Haydn wrote:It would be useful to have one or two examples of the Benny Goodman tracks you are going to record. In my opinion, the majority of modern big band swing CDs come nowhere near matching the feel or sound of the orginal bands of the 1930s and 1940s like Benny Goodman and Glenn Miller. However this means if you can produce something good, it will really stand out.
I was completely blown away by them last year - this woefully short clip should give you some idea of what they're like in action.