BPM: Is there a "dead range"?

Tips and techniques of the trade

Moderators: Mr Awesomer, JesseMiner, CafeSavoy

Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
Yakov
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:02 pm
Location: Miami
Contact:

BPM: Is there a "dead range"?

#1 Post by Yakov » Wed Feb 04, 2004 5:51 pm

Thinking about slow blues on the other forum made me think about this... especially as my taste in slow blues has gone more towards slower -- I once liked to blues at 95 bpm, now I can barely get into it if it's over 85ish. (That's a big difference.) Anyway, I've found that, unless there's something very special about a given song, I don't find it appropriate for dancing if it's between, say, 88 and 110 bpm. You can't blues and you can't lindy. Has anyone else found this to be the case?

julius
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 11:30 am
Location: los angeles

#2 Post by julius » Wed Feb 04, 2004 6:26 pm

There is no tempo range that is inappropriate for dancing.

Unless you are concerned about what dance you are doing.

So I would say: just dance.

voilsb
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 6:50 am
Location: Corvallis, OR
Contact:

Re: BPM: Is there a "dead range"?

#3 Post by voilsb » Wed Feb 04, 2004 6:43 pm

Yakov wrote:I don't find it appropriate for dancing if it's between, say, 88 and 110 bpm. You can't blues and you can't lindy. Has anyone else found this to be the case?
Actually, dancing blues to more uptempo music can be quite an experience! There's a lot of blues music in the 120-140bpm range that's a thrill to dance to.

Likewise, it's sometimes fun to groove lindy or even westie in your "can't dance" tempo range. I'd say it's much more about how the music feels, rather than how fast the music is. Some songs at 120 feel slower and more mellow than stuff at 105. Some stuff at 160 feels "blech" and totally unmotivating to dance to. Some stuff at 88 just screams to be danced. Some stuff at 150 makes me wanna blues, and some stuff at 100 makes me wanna lindy.

On the side, it seems kinda funny that your tempo range (88 - 110) is generally felt as the "sweet spot" tempo range for WCS music.
Brian Voils

User avatar
Yakov
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:02 pm
Location: Miami
Contact:

#4 Post by Yakov » Thu Feb 05, 2004 12:33 pm

i'm not saying "can't dance" or that i'm concerned about what i'm dancing, just that sometimes it's hard to get into a groove at that speed.

User avatar
Lawrence
Posts: 1213
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 2:08 pm
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

#5 Post by Lawrence » Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:11 pm

julius wrote:There is no tempo range that is inappropriate for dancing.

Unless you are concerned about what dance you are doing.

So I would say: just dance.
Wow. See, we DO agree on some things. 8)

I don't think there's a dead zone at all, although I suspect I would want to choose my partner carefully if the tempo gets under 55 BPM. (The word "tantric" suddenly comes to mind.)
Lawrence Page
Austin Lindy Hop
http://www.AustinLindy.com

User avatar
Ron
Posts: 313
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 4:29 pm
Location: San Diego, CA
Contact:

#6 Post by Ron » Fri Feb 06, 2004 1:13 pm

I wouldn't say there is a dead spot, Yakov, but I would say that slow blues at about 85 BPM is about perfect, but blues dancing songs at 100 BPM can work well, too.

Locked